In today’s competitive business landscape, protecting your intellectual property, client relationships, and confidential information is more important than ever. That's why many companies include restraint of trade clauses in employment contracts — to prevent employees from unfairly competing, poaching clients, or disclosing sensitive knowledge after leaving a role.
But what happens when those restraints are breached? A former employee starts working for a direct competitor. Clients mysteriously migrate. Confidential data turns up in the wrong hands. That’s when a business must act — and act strategically. Investigating a breach of restraint of trade is not just about proving wrongdoing; it’s about gathering solid evidence in a legally defensible way.
At Complete Corporate Services (CCS), we’ve spent over four decades supporting Australian businesses, law firms, and corporate clients in navigating complex post-employment disputes.
In this blog, we’ll break down the process of investigating restraint of trade breaches — from early signs to legal action — and how professional investigators can help you protect what’s rightfully yours.
A restraint of trade clause is a contractual provision designed to restrict an employee’s actions after leaving a company. These clauses are common in industries where employees have access to sensitive commercial information, trade secrets, or long-term client relationships.
Typically, restraint clauses might prohibit:
While courts are cautious about enforcing restraints — as they limit a person’s right to work — they will uphold them if they are reasonable in scope, duration, and necessary to protect legitimate business interests.
Breaches of restraint of trade can occur for various reasons, and not always with malicious intent. Common causes include:
Regardless of motive, if a breach occurs, swift investigation is key to preventing further harm and preserving legal remedies.
Spotting the warning signs of a restraint breach early can limit the damage and strengthen your case. Common red flags include:
These signs warrant attention — and if substantiated, a formal breach of restraint of trade investigation should be initiated.
Corporate lawyers often turn to experienced private investigators to gather hard evidence in restraint of trade cases. This is because a legal claim alone isn’t enough — it needs to be backed by facts, documents, patterns of behaviour, and, in some cases, covert intelligence. At CCS, our private investigators assist in:
Discreet observation can confirm whether a former employee is physically working for a competitor or interacting with restricted clients or suppliers.
We can analyse devices, emails, and cloud activity (subject to access permissions) to uncover unauthorised transfers of data, suspicious logins, or communications that indicate intent to breach.
A surprisingly effective tool — many breaches are inadvertently revealed via LinkedIn updates, client posts, or company staff pages that show a new hire in a competing role.
We can conduct interviews with clients, staff, or other relevant parties to gather testimony that may support or disprove breach allegations.
Investigating the competitor’s hiring patterns, relationships with clients, or history of previous restraint disputes can support a broader legal strategy. Our goal is not only to uncover misconduct but to do so in a way that ensures the evidence is admissible, reliable, and ethically obtained.
Because restraint of trade issues often lead to litigation, any investigation must follow proper legal and ethical standards. This includes:
At CCS, all of our investigations are conducted under the guidance of current legislation, including the Fair Work Act, Australian Consumer Law, and state-level surveillance and privacy laws.
To take action, you’ll need more than suspicion. A legally compelling case usually requires evidence that shows:
Supporting this with documented proof — emails, messages, financial records, witness testimony, surveillance reports — significantly improves your legal position.
If a breach is confirmed, your options may include:
A robust investigation gives your legal team the leverage needed to negotiate, litigate, or pursue settlement from a position of strength.
While investigating breaches is critical, prevention is even better. Here are some proactive steps:
And if you're ever unsure whether your clauses are enforceable or your approach is compliant, get a professional opinion — early.
At Complete Corporate Services, we don’t just chase facts — we deliver results that withstand scrutiny. With over 40 years of investigative experience, we:
From initial suspicion to final resolution, we’re your trusted partner in uncovering the truth and enforcing your rights.
A breach of restraint of trade isn’t just a contractual dispute — it’s a direct threat to the commercial and ethical foundation of your business. These clauses exist not to restrict competition unfairly, but to protect the legitimate interests you've worked hard to build — your clients, your trade secrets, your market strategy, and your people. When those protections are ignored or deliberately undermined, the consequences can be far-reaching.
Unchecked breaches can lead to:
In short, the longer you wait, the harder it becomes to contain the damage.
But with a timely, strategic, and well-executed investigation, you don’t just defend what’s yours — you reaffirm your business values. You show your clients, staff, and competitors that your business operates with integrity, and that you take contractual commitments and fair competition seriously.
At Complete Corporate Services (CCS), we’ve supported Australian businesses for over four decades in managing, investigating, and responding to breaches of restraint of trade. Whether you’re gathering early evidence, preparing for legal proceedings, or simply want to understand if a breach has occurred, our team is here to guide you with discretion, clarity, and precision.
Don’t let silence or uncertainty work against you. If you suspect a breach, act now — before your opportunity to respond effectively slips away.